The TRUMP administration exempts new nuclear reactors from environmental review



Wednesday, February  4, 2026-The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has announced a major regulatory change that exempts advanced and experimental nuclear reactors from undergoing the full environmental review process normally required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). 

This categorical exclusion means that projects involving the authorization, siting, construction, operation, reauthorization, and decommissioning of certain new reactor designs will no longer need to prepare detailed Environmental Impact Statements or Environmental Assessments before moving forward. DOE says this change is based on its assessment of modern reactor technologies and aligns with executive directives to streamline environmental reviews.

Under the new rule, DOE can determine that advanced nuclear reactors typically “do not significantly affect the quality of the human environment,” allowing them to bypass the traditional NEPA process that includes extensive analysis and public comment opportunities. The department insists that inherent safety features and passive safety systems in these reactors justify the exclusion and that environmental protections will still be maintained through other oversight mechanisms. DOE has also opened a brief comment period for the public to weigh in on the categorical exclusion’s written record.

Critics argue the move reduces transparency and public participation, as NEPA reviews include evaluations of how projects could impact local ecosystems, water, air, and community health.

Environmental advocates and nuclear safety experts warn that skipping full environmental reviews could overlook risks unique to newer reactor designs that lack real-world operational experience, and that the exemption could limit community input on developments that may affect their surroundings. Supporters, however, say the change could accelerate innovation and deployment of next‑generation nuclear technologies by cutting years off licensing timelines without sacrificing safety.

Post a Comment

0 Comments