Friday, October 30, 2026 - Hollywood actress Halle Berry has suffered a setback in her ongoing custody dispute with former husband Olivier Martinez after a Los Angeles judge declined to restore their previous 50/50 custody arrangement. In a ruling delivered on Thursday, October 29, 2026, Martinez retained primary physical custody of their 13-year-old son, Maceo.
The decision also means Berry cannot currently have overnight visits with her son, marking another difficult development in the high-profile family dispute. However, the judge dissolved the temporary domestic violence restraining order previously obtained by Martinez, giving the Oscar-winning actress a significant legal victory of her own.
The custody battle intensified after Martinez accused Berry of physically abusing their son during an alleged incident at her home in September. He claimed the disagreement happened while Maceo was playing a virtual reality game. Berry has strongly denied the accusations, insisting she has never physically or emotionally abused her child.
Both parents presented evidence during several days of court proceedings, while Maceo also testified behind closed doors. Berry's legal team welcomed the dismissal of the restraining order, while Martinez's attorney described the continued primary custody arrangement as a major victory for his client. Berry nevertheless retains joint legal custody and decision-making authority when the parents cannot agree.
Despite Thursday's ruling, the dispute is far from over, with the judge expected to reconsider custody arrangements in November. The latest developments have attracted considerable public attention, placing renewed focus on the challenges of co-parenting following a high-profile divorce.
Berry and Martinez, who married in 2013 and finalised their divorce in 2023, must now navigate another difficult chapter while the court continues considering their son's best interests. For now, Maceo's living arrangements remain centred around his father, while questions about the family's long-term custody agreement remain unresolved.
0 Comments