Monday, January 12, 2026- President Trump’s appellate court appointees have delivered one of the most striking voting records in recent federal court history, siding with his administration’s policies 133 times while voting against them just 12 times last year.
This remarkable 92% rate of favorable rulings shows that Trump‑appointed judges, particularly those he selected during his first term, have repeatedly stepped in to reverse or uphold policy decisions when lower courts challenged the administration’s legal actions. Their decisions have directly shaped how key aspects of Trump’s agenda have been implemented across the country.
The appeals courts which sit just below the Supreme Court in the federal judiciary handle hundreds of high‑stakes disputes over executive authority, federal regulations, and emergency stays.
Last year’s tally reflects their outsized role in sustaining core elements of the president’s agenda, from defending high‑profile executive actions to sidestepping blocks issued at earlier stages of litigation. Their voting patterns have consistently enabled federal policies to take effect even as opponents push back in trial courts.
Legal experts and observers are taking note because this level of alignment underscores how judicial appointments can have long‑term political and policy consequences. With life tenure for federal judges, the decisions of these appellate jurists will reverberate well beyond the current term, influencing how executive power and legal challenges interact for years to come.
0 Comments