Thursday, January 15, 2026 - President Donald Trump has ordered a partial withdrawal of US military personnel from Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, with some troops expected to depart no later than Tuesday night as tensions with Iran escalate.
Al Udeid, which houses roughly 10,000 US troops and serves
as the largest American military installation in the Middle East and
headquarters of US Central Command, will not be fully evacuated. Officials
described the move as precautionary following warnings from Tehran that it
would target American bases in the region if the US intervenes to protect
Iranian protesters.
Qatar confirmed that the measures were being taken “in
response to the current regional tensions.” The development comes as Trump’s
national security team weighs options after more than 2,000 protesters were
reported killed in Iran.
Speaking aboard Air Force One earlier this week, Trump said:
“The military is looking at it, and we’re looking at some very strong options.”
Asked about possible retaliation from Iran, he added: “If they do that, we will
hit them at levels that they’ve never been hit before.”
Anonymous US officials have said potential actions could
include cyber operations and direct strikes by either the US or Israel. Tehran
has warned that American and Israeli forces would be considered “legitimate
targets” if Washington uses force.
Analysts say the reduction in troop levels represents an
operational calculation rather than a retreat. Dr Bamo Nouri, professor of
International Relations at the University of West London, told Metro that any
US strike on Iran would almost certainly trigger retaliation against nearby US
bases rather than against the American mainland. He described the move as
precautionary, intended to reduce vulnerability and protect personnel “in a
moment of heightened risk.” He added that heavy US casualties would undermine
Trump’s “America First” posture at a time when domestic tolerance for foreign
conflict remains low.
Experts emphasize that the protest movement inside Iran is
driven by domestic political grievances. Dr Katayoun Shahandeh of the SOAS
Centre for Iranian Studies said most Iranians oppose foreign intervention, but
the scale of reported deaths and detentions has changed the calculus.
“With conservative estimates now exceeding 2,500 killed,
widespread detentions, and individuals being prepared for execution, many
Iranians increasingly feel that international intervention is no longer
optional but necessary,” she said. She warned that escalation involving the US
could shift the focus away from political change and toward nuclear
negotiations, similar to 2025, leaving protesters sidelined. She added that
inaction by the international community could enable the regime to outlast the
movement once again.
Amid the Iran crisis, US officials are also focusing
attention on Greenland. Denmark has increased military activity in the region,
with speculation of a NATO deployment circulating. Trump has argued that
Greenland can only be protected from Russia and China under US control, writing
on Truth Social: “Militarily, without the vast power of the United States… NATO
would not be an effective force or deterrent — not even close! They know
that, and so do I. NATO becomes far more formidable and effective with Greenland
in the hands of the United States. Anything less than that is unacceptable.”

0 Comments