Sunday, September 14, 2025 - North Korea has executed citizens for watching or distributing foreign television programmes, including popular South Korean dramas, according to a new United Nations human rights report released on Friday, September 12.
The 14-page review, based on interviews with more than 300
witnesses and escapees, describes a worsening clampdown on personal freedoms
since 2014. It highlights the use of advanced surveillance technologies and
harsher punishments, including the death penalty, for offences such as sharing
foreign entertainment.
James Heenan, head of the UN human rights office for North
Korea, told reporters in Geneva that executions for both political and
non-political crimes have risen since Covid-19 restrictions. While he did not
disclose specific figures, he confirmed that people had already been executed
under the new laws for distributing South Korean TV dramas.
“Under laws, policies and practices introduced since 2015,
citizens have been subjected to increased surveillance and control in all parts
of life,” the report concluded.
The UN’s latest findings follow a landmark 2014 report which
accused Pyongyang of crimes against humanity. The new review also documented
the use of forced labour, including children compelled to work in dangerous
conditions as part of so-called “shock brigades” in industries like coal mining
and construction.
“They’re often children from the lower level of society,
because they’re the ones who can’t bribe their way out of it, and these shock
brigades are engaged in often very hazardous and dangerous work,” Heenan said
during a briefing from Seoul.
Despite these grave findings, the report noted limited
improvements, such as reduced use of violence by guards in detention centres
and the introduction of new laws that appear to strengthen fair trial
guarantees.
North Korea’s diplomatic missions in Geneva and London did
not respond to requests for comment. The government has previously rejected the
UN Human Rights Council resolution authorising the review, dismissing it as
interference in its internal affairs.
0 Comments