Monday, June 23, 2025 - As international concern mounts over escalating tensions in the Middle East, China and the United Kingdom have issued sharply contrasting responses to the United States' recent military strikes on Iran.
On Sunday, June 22, U.S. warplanes bombed three of Iran’s
nuclear sites, Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow, following orders from President
Donald Trump. The strikes marked a significant escalation in Washington’s
involvement in the region’s complex power dynamics, prompting swift reactions
from global leaders.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer described Iran’s nuclear
programme as “a grave threat to international security” and defended the U.S.
operation as an attempt to neutralise that threat. Starmer urged Tehran to
resume diplomatic negotiations, a position echoed by Foreign Secretary David
Lammy, who called on Iran “to show restraint.”
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also
stressed the importance of diplomacy, saying, “Stability must be the priority,
and respect for international law is critical. Now is the moment for Iran to
engage in a credible diplomatic solution. The negotiating table is the only
place to end this crisis.”
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba joined the call for
de-escalation, while emphasising the need to halt Iran’s nuclear weapons
development. “A de-escalation as soon as possible is more important than
anything,” Ishiba said, “but at the same time, Iran’s nuclear weapons
development must be stopped.”
In stark contrast, China and Russia condemned the U.S.
action. China’s foreign ministry called the strikes “a serious violation” of
the United Nations Charter and international law, warning that the attacks
would only inflame regional instability. “The United States has exacerbated
tensions in the Middle East,” the ministry said, urging all parties,
particularly Israel, to implement a ceasefire, protect civilians, and return to
dialogue.
Russia echoed China’s stance, calling the U.S. strikes “an
irresponsible decision” and “a flagrant violation of international law.” In a
statement, the Russian foreign ministry demanded an immediate end to aggression
and called for renewed diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis.
The strikes followed an earlier wave of tit-for-tat attacks
between Iran and Israel, and Tehran had warned that U.S. involvement would have
lasting consequences. As the situation evolves, the international community
remains deeply divided on the path forward.
0 Comments